rs140021654

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000282516.13(NIPBL):ā€‹c.4731A>Gā€‹(p.Glu1577=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000636 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00067 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
ENST00000282516.13 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.66
Variant links:
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 5-37016125-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37016125-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159128.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.66 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000667 (975/1461594) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000811 (902/1111854). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000767. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 426 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 52 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NIPBLNM_133433.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4731A>G p.Glu1577= synonymous_variant 23/47 ENST00000282516.13 NP_597677.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NIPBLENST00000282516.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.4731A>G p.Glu1577= synonymous_variant 23/471 NM_133433.4 ENSP00000282516 P1Q6KC79-1
NIPBLENST00000448238.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4731A>G p.Glu1577= synonymous_variant 23/461 ENSP00000406266 Q6KC79-2
NIPBLENST00000652901.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4731A>G p.Glu1577= synonymous_variant 23/46 ENSP00000499536

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000342
AC:
52
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000330
AC:
83
AN:
251384
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000302
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
135872
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000810
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000422
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000667
AC:
975
AN:
1461594
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000586
AC XY:
426
AN XY:
727098
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000783
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000811
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000580
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000341
AC:
52
AN:
152328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000309
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000392
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000389
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 15, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 17, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 02, 2015- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 25, 2017This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 17, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
7.2
DANN
Benign
0.83
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140021654; hg19: chr5-37016227; API