rs140021654
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The ENST00000282516.13(NIPBL):āc.4731A>Gā(p.Glu1577=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000636 in 1,613,922 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00067 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
NIPBL
ENST00000282516.13 synonymous
ENST00000282516.13 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.66
Genes affected
NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 5-37016125-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-37016125-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159128.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.66 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000667 (975/1461594) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000811 (902/1111854). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000767. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 426 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 52 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIPBL | NM_133433.4 | c.4731A>G | p.Glu1577= | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | ENST00000282516.13 | NP_597677.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIPBL | ENST00000282516.13 | c.4731A>G | p.Glu1577= | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | 1 | NM_133433.4 | ENSP00000282516 | P1 | |
NIPBL | ENST00000448238.2 | c.4731A>G | p.Glu1577= | synonymous_variant | 23/46 | 1 | ENSP00000406266 | |||
NIPBL | ENST00000652901.1 | c.4731A>G | p.Glu1577= | synonymous_variant | 23/46 | ENSP00000499536 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000342 AC: 52AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000330 AC: 83AN: 251384Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000302 AC XY: 41AN XY: 135872
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
83
AN:
251384
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
135872
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000667 AC: 975AN: 1461594Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000586 AC XY: 426AN XY: 727098
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
975
AN:
1461594
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
426
AN XY:
727098
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000341 AC: 52AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
152328
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 02, 2015 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 25, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 17, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at