rs140100861

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_133433.4(NIPBL):c.1985A>G(p.Lys662Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000795 in 1,613,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00092 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

NIPBL
NM_133433.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.57

Variant links:

Genes affected

NIPBL (HGNC:28862): (NIPBL cohesin loading factor) This gene encodes the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B gene product and fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins. The Drosophila protein facilitates enhancer-promoter communication of remote enhancers and plays a role in developmental regulation. It is also homologous to a family of chromosomal adherins with broad roles in sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, and DNA repair. The human protein has a bipartite nuclear targeting sequence and a putative HEAT repeat. Condensins, cohesins and other complexes with chromosome-related functions also contain HEAT repeats. Mutations in this gene result in Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a disorder characterized by dysmorphic facial features, growth delay, limb reduction defects, and cognitive disability. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

NIPBL links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2

Missense variant in the NIPBL gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 86 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 69 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 5.5737 (above the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 6.6817 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005590707).

BP6

Variant 5-36985165-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-36985165-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 96331.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000919 (140/152296) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00858 (131/15274). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00738. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 62 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 140 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NIPBL	NM_133433.4 link	c.1985A>G	p.Lys662Arg	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 47	ENST00000282516.13	NP_597677.2	Q6KC79-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NIPBL	ENST00000282516.13 link	c.1985A>G	p.Lys662Arg	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 47	1	NM_133433.4	ENSP00000282516.8	Q6KC79-1
NIPBL	ENST00000448238.2 link	c.1985A>G	p.Lys662Arg	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 46	1		ENSP00000406266.2	Q6KC79-2
NIPBL	ENST00000652901.1 link	c.1985A>G	p.Lys662Arg	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 46			ENSP00000499536.1	A0A590UJS4
NIPBL	ENST00000504430.5 link	n.1605A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 6 of 8	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000920

AC:

140

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00859

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00399

AC:

1000

AN:

250624

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00294

AC XY:

398

AN XY:

135488

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0287

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000883

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00115

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000782

AC:

1143

AN:

1461694

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000635

AC XY:

462

AN XY:

727138

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0249

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000719

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000919

AC:

140

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000832

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00858

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000195

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00223

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00314

AC:

381

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1

Benign:3

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Jul 31, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 16, 2012

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 08, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.079

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.32

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.16

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.37

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.18

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Benign

0.69

T;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0056

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.30

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

L;L

PrimateAI

Benign

0.34

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.31

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.21

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.27

T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;B

Vest4

0.049

MVP

0.66

MPC

0.20

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

4.8

Varity_R

0.037

gMVP

0.41

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over