rs140118363
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001145809.2(MYH14):c.4685G>A(p.Arg1562Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000263 in 1,596,622 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1562W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001145809.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH14 | NM_001145809.2 | c.4685G>A | p.Arg1562Gln | missense_variant | 34/43 | ENST00000642316.2 | |
MYH14 | NM_001077186.2 | c.4586G>A | p.Arg1529Gln | missense_variant | 33/42 | ||
MYH14 | NM_024729.4 | c.4562G>A | p.Arg1521Gln | missense_variant | 32/41 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH14 | ENST00000642316.2 | c.4685G>A | p.Arg1562Gln | missense_variant | 34/43 | NM_001145809.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00147 AC: 224AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000368 AC: 79AN: 214688Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000275 AC XY: 32AN XY: 116474
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000136 AC: 196AN: 1444304Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000114 AC XY: 82AN XY: 716710
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00147 AC: 224AN: 152318Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00142 AC XY: 106AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 12, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 12, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jul 24, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 17, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 05, 2017 | p.Arg1562Gln in Exon 34 of MYH14: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.6% (116/20972) of African chrom osomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute. org; dbSNP rs140118363). - |
MYH14-related condition Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 12, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 4A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at