rs140148380

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_053025.4(MYLK):c.399G>T(p.Gln133His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00196 in 1,613,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

MYLK
NM_053025.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.697

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYLK (HGNC:7590): (myosin light chain kinase) This gene, a muscle member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, encodes myosin light chain kinase which is a calcium/calmodulin dependent enzyme. This kinase phosphorylates myosin regulatory light chains to facilitate myosin interaction with actin filaments to produce contractile activity. This gene encodes both smooth muscle and nonmuscle isoforms. In addition, using a separate promoter in an intron in the 3' region, it encodes telokin, a small protein identical in sequence to the C-terminus of myosin light chain kinase, that is independently expressed in smooth muscle and functions to stabilize unphosphorylated myosin filaments. A pseudogene is located on the p arm of chromosome 3. Four transcript variants that produce four isoforms of the calcium/calmodulin dependent enzyme have been identified as well as two transcripts that produce two isoforms of telokin. Additional variants have been identified but lack full length transcripts. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYLK links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007837027).

BP6

Variant 3-123739976-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-123739976-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 263911.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr3-123739976-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00175 (267/152334) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00415 (20/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00275. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 136 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYLK	NM_053025.4 link	c.399G>T	p.Gln133His	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 34	ENST00000360304.8	NP_444253.3	Q15746-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYLK	ENST00000360304.8 link	c.399G>T	p.Gln133His	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 34	5	NM_053025.4	ENSP00000353452.3		Q15746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00175

AC:

267

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000555

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00181

AC:

456

AN:

251440

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00196

AC XY:

266

AN XY:

135892

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000496

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00291

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00189

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00214

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00198

AC:

2898

AN:

1461664

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00206

AC XY:

1495

AN XY:

727126

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000727

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00332

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00230

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00195

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00175

AC:

267

AN:

152334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00183

AC XY:

136

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000553

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00151

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00237

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.00194

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00161

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00156

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00198

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00173

AC:

210

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00180

EpiControl

AF:

0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

May 07, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MYLK: BP4, BS2 -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Nov 03, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 13, 2017

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MYLK c.399G>T (p.Gln133His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 251440 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 725 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYLK causing Aortopathy phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.399G>T has been reported in the literature (Milewicz_2017). This report however, does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Aortopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign/benign (n=7) or uncertain significance (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 7

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Feb 16, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 01, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Congenital aneurysm of ascending aorta

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2016

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Found in patient having exome sequencing for an unrelated indication. No known history of familial thoracic aortic aneurysm. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. -

MYLK-related disorder

Benign:1

May 29, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.35

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.46

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

3.3

DANN

Benign

0.95

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.11

LIST_S2

Benign

0.69

.;T;T;T;.;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.026

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0078

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.20

N;N;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.34

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.3

N;.;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.044

Sift

Benign

0.13

T;.;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.025

D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

0.019

B;B;B;B;B;B

Vest4

0.20

MutPred

0.40

Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);Loss of ubiquitination at K129 (P = 0.0615);

MVP

0.35

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.0065

GERP RS

-1.9

Varity_R

0.043

gMVP

0.47

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over