rs140221316
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_002180.3(IGHMBP2):c.1603A>G(p.Ile535Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000295 in 1,612,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I535M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002180.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hereditary peripheral neuropathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00123 AC: 187AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000376 AC: 93AN: 247652 AF XY: 0.000239 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000198 AC: 289AN: 1460592Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000179 AC XY: 130AN XY: 726428 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00123 AC: 187AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 95AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32376792) -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant summary: IGHMBP2 c.1603A>G (p.Ile535Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00038 in 247652 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0048 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4.29 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in IGHMBP2 causing Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S phenotype (0.0011). c.1603A>G has been observed in an individual(s) affected with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Volodarsky_2021). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 32376792). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 432239). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Autosomal recessive distal spinal muscular atrophy 1;C4015349:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2S Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at