rs1405069
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_153370.3(PI16):c.148A>C(p.Thr50Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.462 in 1,612,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 176,539 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T50M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153370.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI16 | NM_153370.3 | c.148A>C | p.Thr50Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 7 | ENST00000373674.4 | NP_699201.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI16 | ENST00000373674.4 | c.148A>C | p.Thr50Pro | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 7 | 1 | NM_153370.3 | ENSP00000362778.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.529 AC: 80257AN: 151800Hom.: 22373 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.478 AC: 118591AN: 248036 AF XY: 0.465 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.455 AC: 665095AN: 1460926Hom.: 154122 Cov.: 52 AF XY: 0.452 AC XY: 328609AN XY: 726776 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.529 AC: 80360AN: 151918Hom.: 22417 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.526 AC XY: 39074AN XY: 74242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at