rs140510381

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):​c.2083G>T​(p.Ala695Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000093 in 1,613,746 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 missense

Scores

5
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.49
Variant links:
Genes affected
AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0501076).
BP6
Variant 17-65536378-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65536378-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 415218.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000965 (141/1461388) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0014 (8/5726). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000911. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 93 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AXIN2NM_004655.4 linkc.2083G>T p.Ala695Ser missense_variant Exon 8 of 11 ENST00000307078.10 NP_004646.3 Q9Y2T1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AXIN2ENST00000307078.10 linkc.2083G>T p.Ala695Ser missense_variant Exon 8 of 11 1 NM_004655.4 ENSP00000302625.5 Q9Y2T1
AXIN2ENST00000375702.5 linkc.1888G>T p.Ala630Ser missense_variant Exon 6 of 9 1 ENSP00000364854.5 E7ES00
AXIN2ENST00000618960.4 linkc.1888G>T p.Ala630Ser missense_variant Exon 7 of 10 5 ENSP00000478916.1 E7ES00
AXIN2ENST00000578251.1 linkn.305G>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 3 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000164
AC:
40
AN:
243932
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000234
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
132516
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000167
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000965
AC:
141
AN:
1461388
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000128
AC XY:
93
AN XY:
726984
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000133
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000591
AC:
9
AN:
152358
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000805
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74502
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000450
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000132
AC:
16
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:2
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Dec 08, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Dec 30, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1
Feb 22, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Observed in individuals with colon, breast, and/or ovarian cancer and in healthy controls (Khan 2011, Pritchard 2018, Moradian 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25236910, 21541676, 34426522, 29641532, 33558524) -

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Apr 08, 2020
Center of Medical Genetics and Primary Health Care
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

This variant is in exon 6 in a non-functional domain. The allele frequency in GnomAD exomes is 0.000164 which is more than 0.0001 derived from the 1,065 clinically reported variants in gene AXIN2 (BS1 Benign Strong). This variant is also observed in healthy adults and GnomAD exomes allele count is 40 which is more than the threshold 5 for dominant gene AXIN2 (BS2 Benign Strong). Additionally, only 1 missense variant in AXIN2 gene is known to be pathogenic (BP1 Benign Supporting). In our study this variant was found in a 28-years-old female with unilateral breast cancer and no reported family history of cancer. Thus, we classified this variant as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

AXIN2-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 22, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
0.14
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
.;D;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.050
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.37
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.49
T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.58
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.64
.;P;P
Vest4
0.56
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
0.057
T
GERP RS
5.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
gMVP
0.30

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140510381; hg19: chr17-63532496; COSMIC: COSV61055891; COSMIC: COSV61055891; API