rs140524886

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.3849G>A(p.Gln1283Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00167 in 1,614,214 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0017 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.90

Variant links:

Genes affected

BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BLM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).

BP6

Variant 15-90809234-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-90809234-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 236818.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr15-90809234-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.9 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0012 (183/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00232 (158/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00203. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 80 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BLM	NM_000057.4 link	c.3849G>A	p.Gln1283Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 22	ENST00000355112.8	NP_000048.1	P54132

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BLM	ENST00000355112.8 link	c.3849G>A	p.Gln1283Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 22	1	NM_000057.4	ENSP00000347232.3		P54132

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00120

AC:

183

AN:

152214

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00232

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

314

AN:

251476

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00123

AC XY:

167

AN XY:

135910

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000896

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00150

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00102

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00171

AC:

2507

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00176

AC XY:

1282

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000209

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000783

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000936

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00199

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00104

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00120

AC:

183

AN:

152332

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00107

AC XY:

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00232

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.00159

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00113

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00180

EpiControl

AF:

0.00142

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Apr 25, 2017

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BLM: BP4, BS2 -

not specified

Benign:3

Oct 10, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 08, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 21, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Sep 01, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Sep 15, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

8.6

DANN

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over