Menu
GeneBe

rs140588099

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.5818G>A(p.Gly1940Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00262 in 1,613,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.91
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, MYH9
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01048705).
BP6
Variant 22-36282733-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36282733-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44573.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36282733-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (222/152342) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00288 (196/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00255. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 108 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 223 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.5818G>A p.Gly1940Arg missense_variant 41/41 ENST00000216181.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.5818G>A p.Gly1940Arg missense_variant 41/411 NM_002473.6 P1P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00146
AC:
223
AN:
152224
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000659
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00148
AC:
371
AN:
251002
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
135684
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000750
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000652
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00274
AC:
4002
AN:
1461476
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00268
AC XY:
1949
AN XY:
727044
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000268
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000887
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00344
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00159
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00146
AC:
222
AN:
152342
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00145
AC XY:
108
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000659
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.00264
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00139
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00270
AC:
10
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00291
AC:
25
ExAC
AF:
0.00152
AC:
185
EpiCase
AF:
0.00229
EpiControl
AF:
0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2024MYH9: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesDec 26, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 09, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30720677) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 06, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 30, 2013Gly1940Arg in exon 41 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (25/8600) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http: //evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs140588099) -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.23
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Benign
0.90
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.62
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.73
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.070
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.62
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.64
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.053
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.51
T
Polyphen
0.0090
B
Vest4
0.27
MutPred
0.19
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.011);
MVP
0.76
MPC
0.64
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
3.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2
Varity_R
0.098
gMVP
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140588099; hg19: chr22-36678779; API