rs140600202
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_032444.4(SLX4):c.2359G>A(p.Glu787Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00117 in 1,612,302 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E787G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032444.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Fanconi anemia complementation group PInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032444.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00122 AC: 185AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00126 AC: 315AN: 249766 AF XY: 0.00141 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00116 AC: 1694AN: 1459998Hom.: 3 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00117 AC XY: 848AN XY: 726424 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00121 AC: 185AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 89AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at