rs140644696
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000075.4(CDK4):c.625C>T(p.Arg209Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000333 in 1,611,212 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CDK4
NM_000075.4 missense
NM_000075.4 missense
Scores
9
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.18
Genes affected
CDK4 (HGNC:1773): (cyclin dependent kinase 4) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Ser/Thr protein kinase family. This protein is highly similar to the gene products of S. cerevisiae cdc28 and S. pombe cdc2. It is a catalytic subunit of the protein kinase complex that is important for cell cycle G1 phase progression. The activity of this kinase is restricted to the G1-S phase, which is controlled by the regulatory subunits D-type cyclins and CDK inhibitor p16(INK4a). This kinase was shown to be responsible for the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma gene product (Rb). Mutations in this gene as well as in its related proteins including D-type cyclins, p16(INK4a) and Rb were all found to be associated with tumorigenesis of a variety of cancers. Multiple polyadenylation sites of this gene have been reported. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0984101).
BP6
Variant 12-57750663-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-57750663-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135825.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=5}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 42 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDK4 | NM_000075.4 | c.625C>T | p.Arg209Cys | missense_variant | 5/8 | ENST00000257904.11 | NP_000066.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000276 AC: 42AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000346 AC: 87AN: 251492Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000390 AC XY: 53AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
251492
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000339 AC: 494AN: 1458940Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 234AN XY: 726026
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
494
AN:
1458940
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
234
AN XY:
726026
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000276 AC: 42AN: 152272Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
74448
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
AC:
45
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 30, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26252490, 26534844, 28060055, 25801821, 28380455, 26580448, 28726808, 25186627, 27640074, 30374176, 33281875, 34130653, 30426508) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | May 12, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 3 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Aug 30, 2023 | The CDK4 c.625C>T (p.Arg209Cys) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.065% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with pancreatic cancer (PMID: 28726808) and breast cancer (PMID: 25186627, 26534844). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with familial melanoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 07, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 19, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 15, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Mar 02, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 17, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 05, 2023 | Variant summary: CDK4 c.625C>T (p.Arg209Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00035 in 251492 control chromosomes, predominantly within Northwestern European (at a frequency of 0.0008) and Swedish European subpopulations (at a frequency of 0.0008) in the gnomAD database (v2.1). These observed subpopulation frequencies are approximately 40 fold higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDK4 causing Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma phenotype (i.e. 8e-04 vs. 2e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in European subpopulations. The variant, c.625C>T, has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with melanoma (e.g., Borroni 2017), and other individuals affected with pancreatic (e.g., Chaffee 2018) breast cancer (e.g., Li 2016, Tung 2015, Schubert_2019), and co-occurring breast and thyroid cancer (e.g., Bakos_2021), although with limited information (i.e. lack of co-occurrence and cosegregation data); moreover, four of these breast cancer cases were of western/northern European ancestry. These reports therefore do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 28060055, 28726808, 26534844, 27640074, 26252490, 25186627, 26580448, 34130653, 30426508). Ten ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) have cited the variant and classified it as VUS (n=6) and likely benign (n=4). At-least one additional submitter has re-classified this variant from a VUS to likely benign since its previous evaluation. Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
CDK4-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 01, 2024 | The CDK4 c.625C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg209Cys. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (Supplementary Info 2, Cohort 1 VUS, Tung et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25186627; Li et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 26534844), melanoma (Borroni et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28060055), and pancreatic cancer (Supplemental Tale 2, Chaffee et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 28726808). This variant was also reported in an study of cutaneous malignant melanoma genes in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (Supplemental Table 6, Lubbe et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27640074). However, this variant has also been reported in unaffected family members and/or control populations (Lubbe et al. 2016. PubMed ID: 27640074; Borroni et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28060055). This variant is reported in 0.065% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from likely benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/135825/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Familial melanoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 03, 2025 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;T;.
Polyphen
B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at