rs140710429
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_001105206.3(LAMA4):c.2143G>T(p.Ala715Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000106 in 1,613,274 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A715V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001105206.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1JJInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMA4 | NM_001105206.3 | c.2143G>T | p.Ala715Ser | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 39 | ENST00000230538.12 | NP_001098676.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMA4 | ENST00000230538.12 | c.2143G>T | p.Ala715Ser | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 39 | 1 | NM_001105206.3 | ENSP00000230538.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251372 AF XY: 0.0000442 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000114 AC: 166AN: 1461144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000117 AC XY: 85AN XY: 726944 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74296 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1JJ Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 708 of the LAMA4 protein (p.Ala708Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs140710429, gnomAD 0.004%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LAMA4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 541216). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt LAMA4 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
not provided Uncertain:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance (ClinVar Variant ID# 541216; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.A708S variant (also known as c.2122G>T), located in coding exon 16 of the LAMA4 gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 2122. The alanine at codon 708 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at