rs140726254

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000533371.6(TPP1):c.-437C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0019 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

TPP1
ENST00000533371.6 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.26

Variant links:

Genes affected

TPP1 (HGNC:2073): (tripeptidyl peptidase 1) This gene encodes a member of the sedolisin family of serine proteases. The protease functions in the lysosome to cleave N-terminal tripeptides from substrates, and has weaker endopeptidase activity. It is synthesized as a catalytically-inactive enzyme which is activated and auto-proteolyzed upon acidification. Mutations in this gene result in late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, which is associated with the failure to degrade specific neuropeptides and a subunit of ATP synthase in the lysosome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TPP1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014937371).

BP6

Variant 11-6617713-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-6617713-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 130609.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4, not_provided=1}. Variant chr11-6617713-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00196 (298/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00354 (147/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00307. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 126 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TPP1	NM_000391.4 link	c.293C>T	p.Thr98Met	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 13	ENST00000299427.12	NP_000382.3	O14773-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TPP1	ENST00000299427.12 link	c.293C>T	p.Thr98Met	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 13	1	NM_000391.4	ENSP00000299427.6		O14773-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00196

AC:

299

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00355

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000660

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00135

AC:

340

AN:

251444

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00137

AC XY:

186

AN XY:

135900

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00351

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00152

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000977

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00189

AC:

2767

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00186

AC XY:

1351

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00430

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00210

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00204

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00172

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00196

AC:

298

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00169

AC XY:

126

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00354

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000660

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00212

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00243

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00318

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00151

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00155

AC:

188

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00131

EpiControl

AF:

0.00196

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:6Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Feb 27, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TPP1: BP4, BS2 -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 2

Uncertain:2Other:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GenomeConnect, ClinGen

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 10, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 03, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Feb 12, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.T98M variant (also known as c.293C>T), located in coding exon 4 of the TPP1 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 293. The threonine at codon 98 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.085

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.45

T;.

Eigen

Benign

0.074

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.15

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.75

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.018

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.79

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.70

N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.12

Sift

Benign

0.24

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

T;.

Polyphen

0.022

B;.

Vest4

0.21

MVP

0.74

MPC

0.21

ClinPred

0.022

GERP RS

5.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.16

gMVP

0.55

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over