rs140758113
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):c.804C>T(p.Thr268Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00088 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000302.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000302.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOD1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.804C>T | p.Thr268Thr | synonymous | Exon 8 of 19 | ENSP00000196061.4 | Q02809-1 | ||
| PLOD1 | c.948C>T | p.Thr316Thr | synonymous | Exon 9 of 20 | ENSP00000524078.1 | ||||
| PLOD1 | c.891C>T | p.Thr297Thr | synonymous | Exon 9 of 20 | ENSP00000524090.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000618 AC: 94AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000608 AC: 153AN: 251440 AF XY: 0.000655 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000908 AC: 1327AN: 1461700Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000895 AC XY: 651AN XY: 727172 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000617 AC: 94AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000712 AC XY: 53AN XY: 74442 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at