rs140766884

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP3BP6BS2

The NM_014000.3(VCL):​c.2025G>A​(p.Val675Val) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0043 in 1,613,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

VCL
NM_014000.3 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.50

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VCL (HGNC:12665): (vinculin) Vinculin is a cytoskeletal protein associated with cell-cell and cell-matrix junctions, where it is thought to function as one of several interacting proteins involved in anchoring F-actin to the membrane. Defects in VCL are the cause of cardiomyopathy dilated type 1W. Dilated cardiomyopathy is a disorder characterized by ventricular dilation and impaired systolic function, resulting in congestive heart failure and arrhythmia. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene, but the biological validity of some variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
VCL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 1W
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 15
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

PP3
Splicing predictors support a deleterious effect. Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 10-74103822-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-74103822-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 36896.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 378 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VCLNM_014000.3 linkc.2025G>A p.Val675Val splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 22 ENST00000211998.10 NP_054706.1
VCLNM_003373.4 linkc.2025G>A p.Val675Val splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 21 NP_003364.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VCLENST00000211998.10 linkc.2025G>A p.Val675Val splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 22 1 NM_014000.3 ENSP00000211998.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00248
AC:
378
AN:
152174
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00241
AC:
607
AN:
251482
AF XY:
0.00232
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000677
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000809
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00457
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00195
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00449
AC:
6556
AN:
1461666
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00430
AC XY:
3129
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000627
AC:
21
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000805
AC:
36
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000765
AC:
2
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000243
AC:
21
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
80
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00552
AC:
6136
AN:
1111822
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00429
AC:
259
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.452
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
320
640
959
1279
1599
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
238
476
714
952
1190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00248
AC:
378
AN:
152292
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00183
AC XY:
136
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000914
AC:
38
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000653
AC:
10
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000943
AC:
10
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00462
AC:
314
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
38
56
75
94
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00346
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00227
EpiCase
AF:
0.00414
EpiControl
AF:
0.00367

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Val675Val in exon 15 of VCL: This variant is classified as benign based on its h igh frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs140766884; NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS).

Jan 24, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Feb 10, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:5
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

VCL: BS2

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 21, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1W Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Sep 15, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 09, 2015
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Nov 01, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
7.6
DANN
Benign
0.80
PhyloP100
-3.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.58
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_AG_spliceai
0.58
Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140766884; hg19: chr10-75863580; API