rs140770112

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_000048.4(ASL):c.1278C>T(p.Cys426Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000134 in 1,613,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ASL
NM_000048.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.900

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ASL (HGNC:746): (argininosuccinate lyase) This gene encodes a member of the lyase 1 family. The encoded protein forms a cytosolic homotetramer and primarily catalyzes the reversible hydrolytic cleavage of argininosuccinate into arginine and fumarate, an essential step in the liver in detoxifying ammonia via the urea cycle. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive disorder argininosuccinic aciduria, or argininosuccinic acid lyase deficiency. A nontranscribed pseudogene is also located on the long arm of chromosome 22. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ASL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

argininosuccinic aciduria
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet

ASL links:

ENSG00000249319 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000249319 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).

BP6

Variant 7-66092795-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-66092795-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 360570.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.9 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000171 (26/152284) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00465 (24/5166). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0032. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 12 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ASL	NM_000048.4 link	c.1278C>T	p.Cys426Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 17	ENST00000304874.14	NP_000039.2	P04424-1A0A024RDL8
ASL	NM_001024943.2 link	c.1278C>T	p.Cys426Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 16		NP_001020114.1	P04424-1A0A024RDL8
ASL	NM_001024944.2 link	c.1218C>T	p.Cys406Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15		NP_001020115.1	P04424-2
ASL	NM_001024946.2 link	c.1200C>T	p.Cys400Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 15		NP_001020117.1	A0A0S2Z316

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ASL	ENST00000304874.14 link	c.1278C>T	p.Cys426Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 17 of 17	1	NM_000048.4	ENSP00000307188.9		P04424-1
ENSG00000249319	ENST00000450043.2 link	c.563+132C>T		intron_variant	Intron 7 of 11	5		ENSP00000396527.2		H7C0S8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152164

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00463

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000546

AC:

137

AN:

250932

AF XY:

0.000516

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00713

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000883

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000130

AC:

190

AN:

1461610

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

727128

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00423

AC:

168

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000580

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53178

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000899

AC:

AN:

1111982

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.484

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15284

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00465

AC:

AN:

5166

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000130

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000355

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency

Benign:3

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Aug 22, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

4.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.77

PhyloP100

-0.90

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over