rs140808195
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_004646.4(NPHS1):c.1170+8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00643 in 1,613,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004646.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | NM_004646.4 | c.1170+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000378910.10 | NP_004637.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS1 | ENST00000378910.10 | c.1170+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_004646.4 | ENSP00000368190.4 | ||||
NPHS1 | ENST00000353632.6 | c.1170+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000343634.5 | |||||
NPHS1 | ENST00000592132.1 | n.177+8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00381 AC: 580AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00392 AC: 982AN: 250218Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00384 AC XY: 520AN XY: 135494
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00670 AC: 9785AN: 1460794Hom.: 42 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00642 AC XY: 4662AN XY: 726706
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00381 AC: 580AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00386 AC XY: 287AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | NPHS1: BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 23, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 24, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Congenital nephrotic syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jan 27, 2021 | - - |
Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 10, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at