rs140916001
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001365088.1(SLC12A6):āc.1412G>Cā(p.Ser471Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00836 in 1,610,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S471R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001365088.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A6 | NM_001365088.1 | c.1412G>C | p.Ser471Thr | missense_variant | 11/26 | ENST00000354181.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC12A6 | ENST00000354181.8 | c.1412G>C | p.Ser471Thr | missense_variant | 11/26 | 1 | NM_001365088.1 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00532 AC: 809AN: 152078Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00584 AC: 1468AN: 251476Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00592 AC XY: 804AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00868 AC: 12654AN: 1458332Hom.: 53 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00845 AC XY: 6136AN XY: 725786
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00531 AC: 808AN: 152196Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00477 AC XY: 355AN XY: 74394
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:8
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 23, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 18, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | SLC12A6: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Agenesis of the corpus callosum with peripheral neuropathy Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pars Genome Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 18, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 28, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 29, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at