rs140986546

chr6-152401198-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7 BS2

The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.6969G>A(p.Val2323=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000121 in 1,614,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: SYNE1 NM_182961.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:4
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.337

Genes affected

SYNE1 (HGNC:17089): (spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1) This gene encodes a spectrin repeat containing protein expressed in skeletal and smooth muscle, and peripheral blood lymphocytes, that localizes to the nuclear membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 8, also referred to as autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 1 or recessive ataxia of Beauce. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
• BP6: Variant 6-152401198-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-152401198-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 286042.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.337 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 13 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SYNE1	NM_182961.4	c.6969G>A	p.Val2323=	synonymous_variant	47/146	ENST00000367255.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SYNE1	ENST00000367255.10	c.6969G>A	p.Val2323=	synonymous_variant	47/146	1	NM_182961.4	P1
SYNE1	ENST00000423061.6	c.6990G>A	p.Val2330=	synonymous_variant	47/146	1
SYNE1	ENST00000461872.6	n.7187G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	45/55	1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13 AN: 152206 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000251 AC: 63 AN: 251278 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000250 AC XY: 34 AN XY: 135822

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00546

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000616

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000125 AC: 182 AN: 1461802 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 91 AN XY: 727208

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00467

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000378

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000265

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13 AN: 152206 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000941 AC XY: 7 AN XY: 74360

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000428 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000756

EpiCase AF: 0.000218

EpiControl AF: 0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

May 23, 2017

- -

Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Dec 13, 2023

- -

not provided Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Nov 01, 2022

SYNE1: BP4, BP7 -

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.41
Cadd	Benign	1.4
Dann	Benign	0.75

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140986546; hg19: chr6-152722333;