rs141077224

Variant names:

• chr17-31330443-G-A
• rs141077224
• NM_001042492.3:c.5757G>A

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr17-31330443-G-A
• chr17-31330443-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7 BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.5757G>A​(p.Glu1919Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 1,613,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000085 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: NF1 NM_001042492.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4 B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 3.25

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.39).
• BP6: Variant 17-31330443-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31330443-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184188.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr17-31330443-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.25 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 13 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NF1	NM_001042492.3	c.5757G>A	p.Glu1919Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 39 of 58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1
NF1	NM_000267.3	c.5694G>A	p.Glu1898Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 38 of 57		NP_000258.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9	c.5757G>A	p.Glu1919Glu	synonymous_variant	Exon 39 of 58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000855 AC: 13 AN: 152124 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000483

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000139 AC: 35 AN: 251248 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 22 AN XY: 135782

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000318

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000202

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000123 AC: 180 AN: 1461678 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000129 AC XY: 94 AN XY: 727140

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000246

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000135

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13 AN: 152240 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8 AN XY: 74430

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000118

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.000155 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000982

EpiCase AF: 0.000273

EpiControl AF: 0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4 Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4

Aug 15, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

NF1: BP4 -

Nov 30, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26214590) -

Aug 25, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:2

Oct 09, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 17, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Sep 15, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

Mar 23, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: NF1 c.5694G>A alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was observed with an allele frequency of 0.0001 in 276970 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is comparable to the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.5694G>A in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. A ClinVar submission from a clinical diagnostic laboratory (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as "likely benign." Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.39
CADD	Benign	11
DANN	Benign	0.57
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.030		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141077224; hg19: chr17-29657461; COSMIC: COSV62205901;