rs141088838
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_015631.6(TCTN3):c.1030G>A(p.Gly344Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00633 in 1,613,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015631.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN3 | NM_015631.6 | c.1030G>A | p.Gly344Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | ENST00000371217.10 | NP_056446.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN3 | ENST00000371217.10 | c.1030G>A | p.Gly344Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | 1 | NM_015631.6 | ENSP00000360261.5 | ||
TCTN3 | ENST00000265993.13 | c.1084G>A | p.Gly362Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | 1 | ENSP00000265993.9 | |||
TCTN3 | ENST00000430368.6 | c.652-935G>A | intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000387567.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00457 AC: 695AN: 152130Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00687 AC: 1728AN: 251378Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00747 AC XY: 1015AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00651 AC: 9523AN: 1461734Hom.: 67 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00681 AC XY: 4955AN XY: 727164
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00454 AC: 691AN: 152248Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00427 AC XY: 318AN XY: 74466
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 28, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | TCTN3: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 07, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Orofacial-digital syndrome IV;C3553758:Joubert syndrome 18 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at