rs141095369
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001371623.1(TCOF1):c.3493G>C(p.Gly1165Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000663 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001371623.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCOF1 | NM_001371623.1 | c.3493G>C | p.Gly1165Arg | missense_variant | 21/27 | ENST00000643257.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCOF1 | ENST00000643257.2 | c.3493G>C | p.Gly1165Arg | missense_variant | 21/27 | NM_001371623.1 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000190 AC: 29AN: 152234Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 56AN: 251190Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000184 AC XY: 25AN XY: 135796
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000540 AC: 79AN: 1461834Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000536 AC XY: 39AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 26, 2020 | - - |
Treacher Collins syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 16, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at