rs141242095

Positions:

• chr14-102042271-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.12258C>T​(p.Thr4086Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000337 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00065 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 (4 hom.)
• Consequence: DYNC1H1 NM_001376.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -2.15

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
• BP6: Variant 14-102042271-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102042271-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 312655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102042271-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.15 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000651 (99/152152) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00187 (9/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00111. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 44 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 99 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5	c.12258C>T	p.Thr4086Thr	synonymous_variant	67/78	ENST00000360184.10	NP_001367.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10	c.12258C>T	p.Thr4086Thr	synonymous_variant	67/78	1	NM_001376.5	ENSP00000348965.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000651 AC: 99 AN: 152036 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00140

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000197

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00259

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000388

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00187

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000250

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000521 AC: 131 AN: 251484 Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000589 AC XY: 80 AN XY: 135912

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00166

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00228

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000272

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00147

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000237

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000304 AC: 445 AN: 1461890 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000364 AC XY: 265 AN XY: 727244

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00134

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00291

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000730

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00131

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000530

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000651 AC: 99 AN: 152152 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 44 AN XY: 74388

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00140

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00259

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000389

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00187

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000250

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000473

Alfa AF: 0.000442 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000623

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000218

EpiControl AF: 0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 30, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Jan 25, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Oct 06, 2020	- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Sep 06, 2017

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

DYNC1H1-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jul 29, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.70
CADD	Benign	0.041
DANN	Benign	0.64
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.7

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.14		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141242095; hg19: chr14-102508608;