rs141323599
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_003680.4(YARS1):c.1015G>A(p.Ala339Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00188 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 36 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A339V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003680.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YARS1 | NM_003680.4 | c.1015G>A | p.Ala339Thr | missense_variant | 9/13 | ENST00000373477.9 | NP_003671.1 | |
YARS1 | XM_011542347.3 | c.385G>A | p.Ala129Thr | missense_variant | 7/11 | XP_011540649.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00124 AC: 189AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00278 AC: 698AN: 251412Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00364 AC XY: 495AN XY: 135876
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00195 AC: 2849AN: 1461776Hom.: 36 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00241 AC XY: 1754AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00123 AC: 188AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00141 AC XY: 105AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 12, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 09, 2023 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate C Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at