rs141389162

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):​c.6579+6A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00134 in 1,613,886 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0074 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00071 ( 15 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002931
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.390

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
DNAH5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 5-13824193-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13824193-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 226604.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00736 (1121/152244) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0258 (1071/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0245. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 512 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkc.6579+6A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 39 of 78 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1 Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkc.6579+6A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 39 of 78 1 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104.4 Q8TE73
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkc.6534+6A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 39 of 78 ENSP00000505288.1 A0A7P0Z455
DNAH5ENST00000683090.1 linkn.1510+6A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 4 of 6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00734
AC:
1116
AN:
152126
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0257
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00192
AC:
482
AN:
251268
AF XY:
0.00149
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000979
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000707
AC:
1034
AN:
1461642
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000619
AC XY:
450
AN XY:
727130
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0257
AC:
861
AN:
33464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00132
AC:
59
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39680
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000927
AC:
8
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53342
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
6
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000117
AC:
13
AN:
1111896
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
87
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
55
111
166
222
277
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00736
AC:
1121
AN:
152244
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00688
AC XY:
512
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0258
AC:
1071
AN:
41530
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00235
AC:
36
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00473
AC:
10
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
53
105
158
210
263
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00463
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.00814
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

6579+6A>G in intron 39 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 2.5% (108/4406) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs141389162). -

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 19, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Benign:3
Sep 21, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Mar 06, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
1.5
DANN
Benign
0.58
PhyloP100
-0.39
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000029
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141389162; hg19: chr5-13824302; API