rs141390073
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_005633.4(SOS1):c.1230G>A(p.Gln410=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00187 in 1,613,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 56 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 51 hom. )
Consequence
SOS1
NM_005633.4 synonymous
NM_005633.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0360
Genes affected
SOS1 (HGNC:11187): (SOS Ras/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS proteins, membrane proteins that bind guanine nucleotides and participate in signal transduction pathways. GTP binding activates and GTP hydrolysis inactivates RAS proteins. The product of this gene may regulate RAS proteins by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Mutations in this gene are associated with gingival fibromatosis 1 and Noonan syndrome type 4. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
?
Variant 2-39023198-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-39023198-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 40665.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr2-39023198-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-39023198-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.036 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00235 (357/152092) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0179 (273/15268). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 200 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 355 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | NM_005633.4 | c.1230G>A | p.Gln410= | synonymous_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000402219.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOS1 | ENST00000402219.8 | c.1230G>A | p.Gln410= | synonymous_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_005633.4 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00234 AC: 355AN: 151974Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
355
AN:
151974
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00749 AC: 1872AN: 250082Hom.: 37 AF XY: 0.00584 AC XY: 790AN XY: 135280
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1872
AN:
250082
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
790
AN XY:
135280
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00182 AC: 2664AN: 1460962Hom.: 51 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00161 AC XY: 1173AN XY: 726784
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2664
AN:
1460962
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1173
AN XY:
726784
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00235 AC: 357AN: 152092Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00269 AC XY: 200AN XY: 74386
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
357
AN:
152092
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
200
AN XY:
74386
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
27
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 17, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2010 | Changed to benign since variant has been observed in two individuals with other known pathogenic variants in PTPN11. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Greenwood Genetic Center Diagnostic Laboratories, Greenwood Genetic Center | Jan 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 03, 2017 | The c.1230G>A (p.Gln410=) variant in SOS1 has been identified in a patient with an alternate molecular basis for disease (BP5; Partners LMM internal data GTR Lab ID: 21766 ClinVar SCV000062189.5). This variant is a synonymous (silent) variant at a nucleotide that is not highly conserved and is not predicted to impact splicing (BP7). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Gln410= variant does not impact the protein (BP4). The filtering allele frequency of the c.1230G>A (p.Gln410=) variant in the SOS1 gene is 4.69% for Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (580/11526 with 95% CI), which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert panel for autosomal dominant RASopathy variants (BA1). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. RASopathy-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied (PMID:29493581): BA1, BP5, BP7, BP4. - |
Noonan syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 25, 2018 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 01, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Fibromatosis, gingival, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jun 28, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at