rs141397228

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_153240.5(NPHP3):​c.2089-9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00455 in 1,611,492 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0046 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP3
NM_153240.5 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.6957
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.80
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP3 (HGNC:7907): (nephrocystin 3) This gene encodes a protein containing a coiled-coil (CC) domain, a tubulin-tyrosine ligase (TTL) domain, and a tetratrico peptide repeat (TPR) domain. The encoded protein interacts with nephrocystin, it is required for normal ciliary development, and it functions in renal tubular development. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 3, and also with renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, and Meckel syndrome type 7. Naturally occurring read-through transcripts exist between this gene and the downstream ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
NPHP3-ACAD11 (HGNC:48351): (NPHP3-ACAD11 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring NPHP3 (nephronophthisis 3, adolescent) and ACAD11 (acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, member 11) genes on chromosome 3. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is thus unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.25).
BP6
Variant 3-132696822-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-132696822-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211684.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr3-132696822-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00384 (585/152284) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0052 (354/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00476. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 313 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP3NM_153240.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2089-9C>T intron_variant ENST00000337331.10 NP_694972.3 Q7Z494-1
NPHP3-ACAD11NR_037804.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2095-9C>T intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP3ENST00000337331.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2089-9C>T intron_variant 1 NM_153240.5 ENSP00000338766.5 Q7Z494-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00384
AC:
585
AN:
152166
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000990
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00520
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00427
AC:
1071
AN:
251100
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00423
AC XY:
574
AN XY:
135748
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000677
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0149
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00619
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00457
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00462
AC:
6745
AN:
1459208
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00449
AC XY:
3260
AN XY:
726154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000419
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00514
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00294
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00384
AC:
585
AN:
152284
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00420
AC XY:
313
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000987
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00520
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00236
Alfa
AF:
0.00417
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00259
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 29, 2015- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 14, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2023NPHP3: BS2 -
NPHP3-related Meckel-like syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Nephronophthisis 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.75

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.70
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.62
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141397228; hg19: chr3-132415666; API