rs141430703
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):c.688G>T(p.Gly230Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000294 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_080680.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL11A2 | NM_080680.3 | c.688G>T | p.Gly230Trp | missense_variant | 5/66 | ENST00000341947.7 | NP_542411.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL11A2 | ENST00000341947.7 | c.688G>T | p.Gly230Trp | missense_variant | 5/66 | 5 | NM_080680.3 | ENSP00000339915.2 | ||
COL11A2 | ENST00000395194.1 | c.688G>T | p.Gly230Trp | missense_variant | 5/5 | 1 | ENSP00000378620.1 | |||
COL11A2 | ENST00000374708.8 | c.688G>T | p.Gly230Trp | missense_variant | 5/64 | 5 | ENSP00000363840.4 | |||
COL11A2 | ENST00000682718.1 | n.505G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000771 AC: 194AN: 251488Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000728 AC XY: 99AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000287 AC: 419AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 215AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152214Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000511 AC XY: 38AN XY: 74420
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | COL11A2: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 07, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30245029, 29072634, 23967202) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 17, 2015 | p.Gly230Trp in exon 5A of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.9% (78/8654) of East Asian chr omosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.o rg; dbSNP rs141430703). - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53;C1866095:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | reference population | Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical Center | Mar 18, 2016 | - - |
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
COL11A2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 13, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jan 01, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at