rs141458731

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024675.4(PALB2):​c.2135C>T​(p.Ala712Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000195 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A712P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

PALB2
NM_024675.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.29

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PALB2 (HGNC:26144): (partner and localizer of BRCA2) This gene encodes a protein that may function in tumor suppression. This protein binds to and colocalizes with the breast cancer 2 early onset protein (BRCA2) in nuclear foci and likely permits the stable intranuclear localization and accumulation of BRCA2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
PALB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group N
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010232568).
BP6
Variant 16-23630019-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-23630019-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 126637.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000192 (281/1461880) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.0052 (30/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00374. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 143 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PALB2NM_024675.4 linkc.2135C>T p.Ala712Val missense_variant Exon 5 of 13 ENST00000261584.9 NP_078951.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PALB2ENST00000261584.9 linkc.2135C>T p.Ala712Val missense_variant Exon 5 of 13 1 NM_024675.4 ENSP00000261584.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000224
AC:
34
AN:
152108
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000294
AC:
74
AN:
251492
AF XY:
0.000338
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000316
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000192
AC:
281
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000197
AC XY:
143
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000597
AC:
2
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000291
AC:
13
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
29
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000232
AC:
20
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00520
AC:
30
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000148
AC:
165
AN:
1111998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000364
AC:
22
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000223
AC:
34
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41532
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000719
AC:
11
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
9
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.526
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000382
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000268
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000247
AC:
30
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 13, 2019
Leiden Open Variation Database
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:curation

Curators: Marc Tischkowitz, Arleen D. Auerbach. Submitter to LOVD: Marc Tischkowitz. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PALB2: BP4 -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:7
Mar 22, 2022
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 27, 2024
Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PM2+BP4+BP6mod -

Jul 07, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Jan 19, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:5
Mar 31, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. Homozygosity for this variant has been confirmed in one or more individuals lacking clinical features consistent with gene-specific recessive disease, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

Aug 11, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jun 01, 2015
Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:case-control

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 12, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Familial cancer of breast;C1835817:Fanconi anemia complementation group N;C3150547:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3 Benign:1
Oct 06, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fanconi anemia complementation group N Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PALB2 p.Ala712Val variant was identified in 11 of 13046 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0008) from Jewish, Polish, German, Australian, and North American individuals or families with high-risk or familial breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer or Lynch syndrome and was identified in 2 of 5548 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004) from healthy individuals (Catucci 2012, Dansonka-Mieszkowska 2010, Hellebrand 2011, Thompson 2015, Tischkowitz 2012, Yurgelun 2015, Zhen 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs141458731) “With other allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae; and as likely benign by GeneDx and four other submitters), and LOVD 3.0 (1x). The variant was observed in control databases in 76 (1 homozygous) of 277240 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 10 of 6466 chromosomes (1 homozygous, freq: 0.002), Latino in 12 of 34420 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European in 36 of 126726 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 12 of 10152 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), and South Asian in 6 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002); it was not observed in the African, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, or the Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The p.Ala712 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood that the variant impacts the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.076
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
0.12
DANN
Benign
0.84
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.028
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.036
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.53
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0058
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.28
.;N
PhyloP100
-1.3
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.041
Sift
Benign
0.13
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.30
T;T
Polyphen
0.017
.;B
Vest4
0.074
MVP
0.23
MPC
0.053
ClinPred
0.0077
T
GERP RS
-8.6
Varity_R
0.022
gMVP
0.11
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141458731; hg19: chr16-23641340; COSMIC: COSV99849032; API