rs141479751
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000426.4(LAMA2):c.8728G>A(p.Val2910Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000481 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2910L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000426.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | NM_000426.4 | c.8728G>A | p.Val2910Ile | missense_variant | 62/65 | ENST00000421865.3 | |
LOC102723409 | XR_001743860.2 | n.12103-4722C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA2 | ENST00000421865.3 | c.8728G>A | p.Val2910Ile | missense_variant | 62/65 | 5 | NM_000426.4 | ||
ENST00000665046.1 | n.789-4722C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00155 AC: 236AN: 152186Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000553 AC: 139AN: 251190Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000427 AC XY: 58AN XY: 135748
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000369 AC: 540AN: 1461834Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000325 AC XY: 236AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00155 AC: 236AN: 152304Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00165 AC XY: 123AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 28, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
LAMA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 18, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at