rs141521925

Positions:

• chr12-76346249-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2 BP4_Strong BS1

The NM_024685.4(BBS10):​c.1736A>G​(p.Lys579Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000296 in 1,612,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: BBS10 NM_024685.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5 B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.18

Genes affected

BBS10 (HGNC:26291): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10) This gene is a member of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) gene family. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive retinal degeneration, obesity, polydactyly, renal malformation and cognitive disability. The proteins encoded by BBS gene family members are structurally diverse and the similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in BBS gene family members is likely due to their shared roles in cilia formation and function. Many BBS proteins localize to the basal bodies, ciliary axonemes, and pericentriolar regions of cells. BBS proteins may also be involved in intracellular trafficking via microtubule-related transport. The protein encoded by this gene is likely not a ciliary protein but rather has distant sequence homology to type II chaperonins. As a molecular chaperone, this protein may affect the folding or stability of other ciliary or basal body proteins. Inhibition of this protein's expression impairs ciliogenesis in preadipocytes. Mutations in this gene cause Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004707277).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (223/152362) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00503 (209/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00447. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 100 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BBS10	NM_024685.4	c.1736A>G	p.Lys579Arg	missense_variant	2/2	ENST00000650064.2	NP_078961.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BBS10	ENST00000650064.2	c.1736A>G	p.Lys579Arg	missense_variant	2/2		NM_024685.4	ENSP00000497413	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00146 AC: 222 AN: 152244 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00502

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000458

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000352 AC: 88 AN: 249916 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000281 AC XY: 38 AN XY: 135066

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00492

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000329

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000174 AC: 254 AN: 1460044 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000160 AC XY: 116 AN XY: 726170

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00614

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000514

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00146 AC: 223 AN: 152362 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 100 AN XY: 74512

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00503

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000457

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00189

Alfa AF: 0.000460 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00163

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00295 AC: 13

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ExAC AF: 0.000519 AC: 63

Asia WGS AF: 0.000577 AC: 2 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5 Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:2 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Jan 25, 2018	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Feb 28, 2018	Variant summary: BBS10 c.1736A>G (p.Lys579Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Intermediate domain (Stoetzel_NatGen_2006) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00052 in 120630 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BBS10 causing Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (0.00052 vs 0.0013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1736A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (Stoetzel_NatGen_2006). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10 Uncertain:2 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Myriad Genetics, Inc.	Oct 27, 2021	NM_024685.3(BBS10):c.1736A>G(K579R) is a missense variant classified as a variant of uncertain significance in the context of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. K579R has been observed in cases with relevant disease (PMID: 16582908, 24488770). Functional assessments of this variant are available in the literature (PMID: 20498079). K579R has been observed in population frequency databases (gnomAD: AFR 0.46%). In summary, there is insufficient evidence to classify NM_024685.3(BBS10):c.1736A>G(K579R) as pathogenic or benign. Please note: this variant was assessed in the context of healthy population screening. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Feb 13, 2020	- -

not provided Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Sep 09, 2019

Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect, specifically, in vivo complementation analysis in Zebrafish demonstrates significant difference from wild type, and the authors predict K579R is a null allele (Zaghloul et al., 2010); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in the homozgyous state in a middle eastern patient with Bardet-Biedl syndrome who also harbored another BBS10 homozygous variant, that the authors felt was more likely to be causal (Stoetzel et al., 2006); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 20498079, 16582908, 24488770) -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.069
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.43	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.39
CADD	Benign	5.5
DANN	Benign	0.90
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.16	T;T
Eigen	Benign	-0.96
Eigen_PC	Benign	-1.0
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.20	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.38	.;T
M_CAP	Benign	0.016	T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0047	T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.58	T
MutationAssessor	Benign	1.7	L;L
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	N
PrimateAI	Benign	0.30	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-0.52	N;.
REVEL	Benign	0.16
Sift	Uncertain	0.026	D;.
Sift4G	Uncertain	0.048	D;.
Polyphen		0.028	B;B
Vest4		0.62
MVP		0.79
MPC		0.052
ClinPred		0.0076	T
GERP RS		1.3
Varity_R		0.039
gMVP		0.17

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141521925; hg19: chr12-76740029;