rs141528541
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.13260+14A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0104 in 1,532,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 122 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0076 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 108 hom. )
Consequence
RYR2
NM_001035.3 intron
NM_001035.3 intron
Scores
5
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0330
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_addAF=-0.713467).
BP6
Variant 1-237784986-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237784986-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36732.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237784986-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00764 (1164/152270) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0247 (119/4818). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0211. There are 14 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 552 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1164 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.13260+14A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000366574.7 | NP_001026.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.13260+14A>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_001035.3 | ENSP00000355533 | P1 | |||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.13248+14A>G | intron_variant | ENSP00000499653 | ||||||
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.13281+14A>G | intron_variant | ENSP00000499787 | ||||||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | c.*4352+14A>G | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 5 | ENSP00000499659 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00766 AC: 1165AN: 152152Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1165
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00926 AC: 1488AN: 160766Hom.: 14 AF XY: 0.0103 AC XY: 881AN XY: 85816
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1488
AN:
160766
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
881
AN XY:
85816
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0107 AC: 14731AN: 1379892Hom.: 108 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.0109 AC XY: 7478AN XY: 683478
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
14731
AN:
1379892
Hom.:
Cov.:
25
AF XY:
AC XY:
7478
AN XY:
683478
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00764 AC: 1164AN: 152270Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00741 AC XY: 552AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1164
AN:
152270
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
552
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
28
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
45
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
75
ExAC
AF:
AC:
775
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 18, 2012 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 27, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 13, 2015 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
MutationTaster
Benign
N
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at