rs141539554
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.6001C>T(p.Arg2001Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000178 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2001H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000375 AC: 57AN: 152136Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000486 AC: 122AN: 251270 AF XY: 0.000538 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000158 AC: 231AN: 1461726Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000184 AC XY: 134AN XY: 727164 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152254Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000430 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74454 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at