rs141541387
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_002294.3(LAMP2):āc.755T>Gā(p.Ile252Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00181 in 1,208,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. There are 695 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0012 ( 0 hom., 30 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes š: 0.0019 ( 2 hom. 665 hem. )
Consequence
LAMP2
NM_002294.3 missense
NM_002294.3 missense
Scores
9
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.15
Genes affected
LAMP2 (HGNC:6501): (lysosomal associated membrane protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of a family of membrane glycoproteins. This glycoprotein provides selectins with carbohydrate ligands. It may play a role in tumor cell metastasis. It may also function in the protection, maintenance, and adhesion of the lysosome. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09243721).
BP6
Variant X-120446414-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-120446414-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44437.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-120446414-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-120446414-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMP2 | NM_002294.3 | c.755T>G | p.Ile252Ser | missense_variant | 6/9 | ENST00000200639.9 | NP_002285.1 | |
LAMP2 | NM_001122606.1 | c.755T>G | p.Ile252Ser | missense_variant | 6/9 | NP_001116078.1 | ||
LAMP2 | NM_013995.2 | c.755T>G | p.Ile252Ser | missense_variant | 6/9 | NP_054701.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMP2 | ENST00000200639.9 | c.755T>G | p.Ile252Ser | missense_variant | 6/9 | 1 | NM_002294.3 | ENSP00000200639.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00117 AC: 130AN: 111435Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000893 AC XY: 30AN XY: 33593
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
130
AN:
111435
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
33593
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00105 AC: 193AN: 183379Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00114 AC XY: 77AN XY: 67835
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
193
AN:
183379
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
67835
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00188 AC: 2058AN: 1096838Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00184 AC XY: 665AN XY: 362244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2058
AN:
1096838
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
665
AN XY:
362244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00117 AC: 130AN: 111490Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000891 AC XY: 30AN XY: 33658
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
130
AN:
111490
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
33658
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
AC:
130
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:7
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Feb 24, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 15, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 28, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 14, 2022 | The p.Ile252Ser variant in LAMP2 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 0.18% (169/92563) of European chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 10, 2023 | - - |
Danon disease Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 15, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 17, 2022 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 31, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.65, 0.73
.;P;P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at