rs141571092

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):​c.2032-7G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00288 in 1,612,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 15 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00009840
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.682

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
COL5A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 2-189060790-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189060790-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136943.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00261 (397/152198) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00319 (217/67984). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00284. There are 15 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 171 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 397 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL5A2NM_000393.5 linkc.2032-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 30 of 53 ENST00000374866.9 NP_000384.2 P05997
COL5A2XM_011510573.4 linkc.1894-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 33 of 56 XP_011508875.1
COL5A2XM_047443251.1 linkc.1894-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 35 of 58 XP_047299207.1
COL5A2XM_047443252.1 linkc.1894-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 34 of 57 XP_047299208.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL5A2ENST00000374866.9 linkc.2032-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 30 of 53 1 NM_000393.5 ENSP00000364000.3 P05997
COL5A2ENST00000618828.1 linkc.871-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 23 of 46 5 ENSP00000482184.1 A0A087WYX9
COL5A2ENST00000470524.2 linkn.138-7G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 3 of 7 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00261
AC:
397
AN:
152080
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000555
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.143
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000590
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00319
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00167
AC:
419
AN:
250998
AF XY:
0.00158
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000695
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00291
AC:
4250
AN:
1459828
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00286
AC XY:
2075
AN XY:
726392
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
11
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000582
AC:
26
AN:
44696
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000766
AC:
2
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39658
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000278
AC:
24
AN:
86210
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
101
AN:
53376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00355
AC:
3937
AN:
1110236
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00245
AC:
148
AN:
60324
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.447
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
183
366
550
733
916
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
148
296
444
592
740
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00261
AC:
397
AN:
152198
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00230
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000554
AC:
23
AN:
41540
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000589
AC:
9
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00123
AC:
13
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00319
AC:
217
AN:
67984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20
40
61
81
101
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00256
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00297
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00311
EpiControl
AF:
0.00314

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 12, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Aug 07, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

COL5A2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Apr 02, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
3.6
DANN
Benign
0.49
PhyloP100
-0.68
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000098
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141571092; hg19: chr2-189925516; API