rs141650732
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_014244.5(ADAMTS2):āc.2267T>Cā(p.Val756Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000674 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014244.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | NM_014244.5 | c.2267T>C | p.Val756Ala | missense_variant | 15/22 | ENST00000251582.12 | NP_055059.2 | |
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417895.1 | c.1772T>C | p.Val591Ala | missense_variant | 14/21 | XP_047273851.1 | ||
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417896.1 | c.1385T>C | p.Val462Ala | missense_variant | 13/20 | XP_047273852.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000251582.12 | c.2267T>C | p.Val756Ala | missense_variant | 15/22 | 1 | NM_014244.5 | ENSP00000251582 | P2 | |
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000518335.3 | c.2267T>C | p.Val756Ala | missense_variant | 15/21 | 3 | ENSP00000489888 | A2 | ||
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000698889.1 | c.2267T>C | p.Val756Ala | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 15/21 | ENSP00000514008 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000802 AC: 122AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000780 AC: 196AN: 251354Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000824 AC XY: 112AN XY: 135902
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000661 AC: 966AN: 1461828Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000646 AC XY: 470AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000801 AC: 122AN: 152326Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 75AN XY: 74486
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 11, 2020 | - - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Mar 01, 2020 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 28, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at