rs141771814

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_020975.6(RET):c.1668C>G(p.Ser556Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000018 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.260

Variant links:

Genes affected

RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

RET links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).

BP6

Variant 10-43112872-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43112872-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 261394.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.26 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152306) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000505 (21/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000338. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RET	NM_020975.6 link	c.1668C>G	p.Ser556Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 20	ENST00000355710.8	NP_066124.1	P07949-1A0A024R7T2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RET	ENST00000355710.8 link	c.1668C>G	p.Ser556Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 20	5	NM_020975.6	ENSP00000347942.3		P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000199

AC:

AN:

251166

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000736

AC XY:

AN XY:

135810

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000547

AC:

AN:

1461742

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000275

AC XY:

AN XY:

727162

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000175

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000505

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Aug 23, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A;C0025269:Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B;C0031511:Pheochromocytoma;C1833921:Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma;C3888239:Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1

Benign:1

Nov 24, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 18, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.38

CADD

Benign

9.8

DANN

Benign

0.83

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over