rs141772938
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 1P and 8B. PP2BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001098.3(ACO2):c.220C>G(p.Leu74Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00461 in 1,614,196 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0047 ( 26 hom. )
Consequence
ACO2
NM_001098.3 missense
NM_001098.3 missense
Scores
3
9
7
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.864
Genes affected
ACO2 (HGNC:118): (aconitase 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the aconitase/IPM isomerase family. It is an enzyme that catalyzes the interconversion of citrate to isocitrate via cis-aconitate in the second step of the TCA cycle. This protein is encoded in the nucleus and functions in the mitochondrion. It was found to be one of the mitochondrial matrix proteins that are preferentially degraded by the serine protease 15(PRSS15), also known as Lon protease, after oxidative modification. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), ACO2. . Gene score misZ 2.9201 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 4.3251 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with infantile cerebellar-retinal degeneration, autosomal recessive optic atrophy, optic atrophy 9.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018066943).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 26 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACO2 | NM_001098.3 | c.220C>G | p.Leu74Val | missense_variant | 3/18 | ENST00000216254.9 | NP_001089.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACO2 | ENST00000216254.9 | c.220C>G | p.Leu74Val | missense_variant | 3/18 | 1 | NM_001098.3 | ENSP00000216254 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00363 AC: 553AN: 152254Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
553
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00370 AC: 929AN: 250844Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00377 AC XY: 511AN XY: 135686
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
929
AN:
250844
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
511
AN XY:
135686
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00471 AC: 6886AN: 1461824Hom.: 26 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00456 AC XY: 3317AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6886
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3317
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00362 AC: 552AN: 152372Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00352 AC XY: 262AN XY: 74518
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
552
AN:
152372
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
262
AN XY:
74518
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
13
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
47
ExAC
AF:
AC:
498
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:3Uncertain:6Benign:4Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:2Uncertain:3Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, flagged submission | clinical testing | Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tübingen | Feb 01, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ACO2 p.Leu74Val variant was identified in the literature in two adult male siblings with optic atrophy beginning in childhood; the p.L74V variant was found as a compound heterozygous mutation with a ACO2 p.G661R variant. Decreased ACO2 protein levels were observed in fibroblasts from these two patients (Metodiev_2014_PMID:25351951). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs141772938) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Fulgent Genetics, GeneDx, EGL Genetics and Mayo Clinic, and as likely pathogenic by CeGaT Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen). The variant was identified in control databases in 1055 of 282256 chromosomes (4 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.003738 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 839 of 128790 chromosomes (freq: 0.006514), Other in 30 of 7208 chromosomes (freq: 0.004162), European (Finnish) in 80 of 25082 chromosomes (freq: 0.00319), South Asian in 52 of 30602 chromosomes (freq: 0.001699), African in 23 of 24894 chromosomes (freq: 0.000924) and Latino in 31 of 35394 chromosomes (freq: 0.000876), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish or East Asian populations. The p.Leu74 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2023 | ACO2: BP5, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 12, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 26, 2016 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 16, 2024 | Functional data demonstrated that the mutant protein failed to rescue mitochondrial aconitase deficient yeast strain (PMID: 25351951); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28463998, 29577077, 34056600, 31106992, 30689204, 31765440, 32519519, 34426522, 34354088, 34234304, 25351951, 32449285, 30831606, 30118607, 38007539, 37734845) - |
Infantile cerebellar-retinal degeneration;C4225384:Optic atrophy 9 Uncertain:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant identified in multiple GenomeConnect participants. Variant classified, most recently, as Uncertain significance and reported on 01-02-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 26957. Variant previously reported as a "disease-causing mutation" by GTR ID 26957 in April 2015. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
OPTIC ATROPHY 9, AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Dec 01, 2014 | - - |
Optic atrophy 9 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Jun 23, 2022 | - - |
ACO2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 29, 2023 | The ACO2 c.220C>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Leu74Val. This variant has been reported several times in the compound heterozygous state in individuals affected with optic atrophy and has been found to segregate with disease in the cases of multiple affected family members (Metodiev et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25351951; Kelman et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 30118607; Benkirane et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34234304; Charif et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34056600). In many of the reported cases, this variant was found in combination with a loss-of-function variant suggesting the p.Leu74Val substitution has a mild effect on the encoded protein (Charif et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34056600). Functional studies suggest that this variant may alter stability of the protein (Metodiev et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25351951). However, this variant has also been reported at frequencies up to ~0.7%, including four homozygotes in a large population database. This variant also has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity in the ClinVar database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/189310/). Currently, we suspect that this variant is pathogenic and represents a mildly hypomorphic allele; however, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the conflicting functional and genetic evidence. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 26, 2024 | Variant summary: ACO2 c.220C>G (p.Leu74Val) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Aconitase/3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit, alpha/beta/alpha domain (IPR001030) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0037 in 250844 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. c.220C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with isolated or syndromic optic neuropathy with encephalopathy and cerebellar atrophy (Metodiev_2014, Benkirane_2021, Charif_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with ACO2-Related Disorders. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function and this variant was unable to complement the growth defect in yeast model (Metodiev_2014). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 34234304, 34056600, 25351951). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 189310). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Infantile cerebellar-retinal degeneration Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
P;P
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at