rs141786883

Positions:

chr1-42752582-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP7BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_022356.4(P3H1):c.1428C>T(p.Gly476=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000289 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

P3H1
NM_022356.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.24

Variant links:

Genes affected

P3H1 (HGNC:19316): (prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that is a member of the collagen prolyl hydroxylase family. These enzymes are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and their activity is required for proper collagen synthesis and assembly. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type VIII. Three alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. Other variants may exist, but their biological validity has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]

P3H1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.24 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000285 (417/1461872) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00829 (329/39700). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00755. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 221 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
P3H1	NM_022356.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1428C>T	p.Gly476=	synonymous_variant	9/15	ENST00000296388.10	NP_071751.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
P3H1	ENST00000296388.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.1428C>T	p.Gly476=	synonymous_variant	9/15	1	NM_022356.4	ENSP00000296388	P1	Q32P28-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000322

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00385

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000829

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000203

AC:

AN:

251466

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000169

AC XY:

AN XY:

135912

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000924

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000849

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000285

AC:

417

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000304

AC XY:

221

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00829

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000742

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000719

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000322

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000242

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000433

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00386

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000830

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000101

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000208

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Osteogenesis imperfecta type 8

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Nov 01, 2018

- -

Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Recessive

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

P3H1-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Sep 23, 2019

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.91

CADD

Benign

0.17

DANN

Benign

0.58

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over