rs141844887

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005271.5(GLUD1):c.1470G>A(p.Thr490Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00143 in 1,588,530 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0077 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

GLUD1
NM_005271.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.366

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GLUD1 (HGNC:4335): (glutamate dehydrogenase 1) This gene encodes glutamate dehydrogenase, which is a mitochondrial matrix enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of glutamate to alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonia. This enzyme has an important role in regulating amino acid-induced insulin secretion. It is allosterically activated by ADP and inhibited by GTP and ATP. Activating mutations in this gene are a common cause of congenital hyperinsulinism. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. The related glutamate dehydrogenase 2 gene on the human X-chromosome originated from this gene via retrotransposition and encodes a soluble form of glutamate dehydrogenase. Related pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 10, 18 and X. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

GLUD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia

GLUD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).

BP6

Variant 10-87057715-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-87057715-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129163.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.366 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00766 (1164/151980) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.027 (1120/41434). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0257. There are 17 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 561 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GLUD1	NM_005271.5 link	c.1470G>A	p.Thr490Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 13	ENST00000277865.5	NP_005262.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GLUD1	ENST00000277865.5 link	c.1470G>A	p.Thr490Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 13	1	NM_005271.5	ENSP00000277865.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00765

AC:

1161

AN:

151862

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0270

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00184

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000623

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000949

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00385

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00197

AC:

495

AN:

251464

AF XY:

0.00146

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0269

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000528

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000775

AC:

1114

AN:

1436550

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000660

AC XY:

473

AN XY:

716204

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0267

AC:

879

AN:

32976

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000984

AC:

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25944

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000253

AC:

AN:

39582

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000175

AC:

AN:

85698

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000169

AC:

AN:

53394

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00141

AC:

AN:

5676

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000422

AC:

AN:

1089040

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00188

AC:

112

AN:

59532

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

148

198

247

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

160

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00766

AC:

1164

AN:

151980

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00756

AC XY:

561

AN XY:

74248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0270

AC:

1120

AN:

41434

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00184

AC:

AN:

15258

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5172

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000623

AC:

AN:

4814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000949

AC:

AN:

10534

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

67988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00381

AC:

AN:

2102

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

161

215

269

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00330

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00829

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Nov 10, 2020

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 06, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Mar 03, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

3.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.71

PhyloP100

-0.37

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over