rs141864044
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP2BS2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1174G>A variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in trans with a known pathogenic CDH1 variant (phase unknown) and observed in the homozygous state in gnomAD v2.0.2 (BP2; internal laboratory contributor and gnomAD). Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA288019/MONDO:0007648/007
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004360.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | NM_004360.5 | c.1174G>A | p.Val392Ile | missense_variant | 9/16 | ENST00000261769.10 | NP_004351.1 | |
CDH1 | NM_001317185.2 | c.-442G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 9/16 | NP_001304114.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317186.2 | c.-646G>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 9/15 | NP_001304115.1 | |||
CDH1 | NM_001317184.2 | c.1137+1086G>A | intron_variant | NP_001304113.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDH1 | ENST00000261769.10 | c.1174G>A | p.Val392Ile | missense_variant | 9/16 | 1 | NM_004360.5 | ENSP00000261769.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000135 AC: 34AN: 251470Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000155 AC XY: 21AN XY: 135906
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000773 AC: 113AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000908 AC XY: 66AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 06, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 04, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 27, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Feb 27, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 17, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de InvestigaĆ§Ć£o e InovaĆ§Ć£o em SaĆŗde, University of Porto | Aug 01, 2022 | BS2; BP2 (PMID: 30311375) - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 17, 2023 | Variant summary: CDH1 c.1174G>A (p.Val392Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 251470 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4.78 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Although observed in the literature, to our knowledge, no occurrence and/or penetrant association of c.1174G>A in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer/Lobular Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel | Aug 10, 2023 | The c.1174G>A variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in trans with a known pathogenic CDH1 variant (phase unknown) and observed in the homozygous state in gnomAD v2.0.2 (BP2; internal laboratory contributor and gnomAD). Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at