rs141864044

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BS2BP2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1174G>A variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in trans with a known pathogenic CDH1 variant (phase unknown) and observed in the homozygous state in gnomAD v2.0.2 (BP2; internal laboratory contributor and gnomAD). Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA288019/MONDO:0007648/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.79

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

BS2

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.1174G>A	p.Val392Ile	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.-442G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.-646G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 9 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.1137+1086G>A		intron_variant	Intron 8 of 14		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.1174G>A	p.Val392Ile	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152132

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000135

AC:

AN:

251470

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000155

AC XY:

AN XY:

135906

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000849

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000773

AC:

113

AN:

1461880

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000908

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000545

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000531

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000993

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000806

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000663

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000340

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000682

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000157

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Dec 06, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 27, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 25, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 04, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Benign:2

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS2; BP2 (PMID: 30311375) -

not provided

Benign:2

Feb 27, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 15, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 17, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.1174G>A (p.Val392Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin-like domain (IPR002126) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 251470 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 4.78 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Although observed in the literature, to our knowledge, no occurrence and/or penetrant association of c.1174G>A in individuals affected with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer/Lobular Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Familial cancer of breast;C1140680:Ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Apr 21, 2021

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Aug 10, 2023

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

The c.1174G>A variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). This variant was observed in trans with a known pathogenic CDH1 variant (phase unknown) and observed in the homozygous state in gnomAD v2.0.2 (BP2; internal laboratory contributor and gnomAD). Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.060

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.59

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

CADD

Benign

0.0060

DANN

Benign

0.63

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.21

T;T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-2.2

Eigen_PC

Benign

-2.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.036

LIST_S2

Benign

0.065

T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0036

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.77

N;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.32

N;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.054

Sift

Benign

0.35

T;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.24

T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0010

B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.10

MVP

0.31

MPC

0.20

ClinPred

0.050

GERP RS

-12

Varity_R

0.037

gMVP

0.19

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over