rs141911199
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001384732.1(CPLANE1):āc.4517A>Gā(p.His1506Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000979 in 1,605,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001384732.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | NM_001384732.1 | c.4517A>G | p.His1506Arg | missense_variant | 26/53 | ENST00000651892.2 | NP_001371661.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPLANE1 | ENST00000651892.2 | c.4517A>G | p.His1506Arg | missense_variant | 26/53 | NM_001384732.1 | ENSP00000498265 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000880 AC: 134AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000892 AC: 212AN: 237794Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000931 AC XY: 120AN XY: 128934
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000989 AC: 1437AN: 1452716Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 729AN XY: 722226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000880 AC: 134AN: 152350Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000779 AC XY: 58AN XY: 74502
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 27, 2023 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 02, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 09, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 29, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Joubert syndrome 17 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Mar 16, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at