rs141925556
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The ENST00000495186.6(EBP):c.511C>T(p.Arg171Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000921 in 1,209,745 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. There are 338 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R171H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000495186.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBP | NM_006579.3 | c.511C>T | p.Arg171Cys | missense_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000495186.6 | NP_006570.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBP | ENST00000495186.6 | c.511C>T | p.Arg171Cys | missense_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_006579.3 | ENSP00000417052 | P1 | |
EBP | ENST00000276096.10 | n.469C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/5 | 2 | |||||
EBP | ENST00000498425.1 | n.632C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/5 | 3 | |||||
EBP | ENST00000446158.5 | downstream_gene_variant | 5 | ENSP00000390031 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000635 AC: 71AN: 111825Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000559 AC XY: 19AN XY: 34001
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000641 AC: 116AN: 180993Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000624 AC XY: 41AN XY: 65753
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000950 AC: 1043AN: 1097868Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000878 AC XY: 319AN XY: 363250
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000635 AC: 71AN: 111877Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000558 AC XY: 19AN XY: 34063
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jun 17, 2018 | - - |
Chondrodysplasia punctata 2 X-linked dominant Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 26, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
EBP-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 01, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at