rs141953425
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1
The NM_001211.6(BUB1B):c.1001C>T(p.Pro334Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000893 in 1,614,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001211.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUB1B | NM_001211.6 | c.1001C>T | p.Pro334Leu | missense_variant | 8/23 | ENST00000287598.11 | NP_001202.5 | |
LOC107984763 | XR_001751506.2 | n.218-5384G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUB1B | ENST00000287598.11 | c.1001C>T | p.Pro334Leu | missense_variant | 8/23 | 1 | NM_001211.6 | ENSP00000287598 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000616 AC: 155AN: 251444Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000545 AC XY: 74AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000924 AC: 1351AN: 1461884Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 644AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000597 AC: 91AN: 152322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000483 AC XY: 36AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | BUB1B: BP4 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 09, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27331020, 24728327) - |
Carcinoma of colon;C1850343:Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome 1;C1864389:Premature chromatid separation trait Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Jul 08, 2021 | The BUB1B c.1001C>T (p.Pro334Leu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.13% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/15-40477786-C-T). In silico tools are not in agreement about the effect of this variant on protein function, but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. This variant has been reported in a patient with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PMID: 26580448). It has also been identified in 2/1358 non-cancer control individuals in a study of individuals with multiple primary cancers (PMID: 29641532). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: no criteria met. - |
Mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at