rs141971833
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_213655.5(WNK1):āc.4410A>Gā(p.Ser1470=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00252 in 1,614,212 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 86 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0039 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.0024 ( 82 hom. )
Consequence
WNK1
NM_213655.5 synonymous
NM_213655.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.88
Genes affected
WNK1 (HGNC:14540): (WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1) This gene encodes a member of the WNK subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. The encoded protein may be a key regulator of blood pressure by controlling the transport of sodium and chloride ions. Mutations in this gene have been associated with pseudohypoaldosteronism type II and hereditary sensory neuropathy type II. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described but the full-length nature of all of them has yet to be determined.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 12-883559-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-883559-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 310820.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-883559-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00395 (601/152342) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0319 (154/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0278. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 319 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNK1 | NM_213655.5 | c.4410A>G | p.Ser1470= | synonymous_variant | 16/28 | ENST00000340908.9 | |
WNK1 | NM_018979.4 | c.3654A>G | p.Ser1218= | synonymous_variant | 16/28 | ENST00000315939.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNK1 | ENST00000340908.9 | c.4410A>G | p.Ser1470= | synonymous_variant | 16/28 | 5 | NM_213655.5 | A2 | |
WNK1 | ENST00000315939.11 | c.3654A>G | p.Ser1218= | synonymous_variant | 16/28 | 1 | NM_018979.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00395 AC: 602AN: 152224Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
602
AN:
152224
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00465 AC: 1170AN: 251406Hom.: 26 AF XY: 0.00560 AC XY: 761AN XY: 135898
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1170
AN:
251406
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
761
AN XY:
135898
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00237 AC: 3461AN: 1461870Hom.: 82 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00309 AC XY: 2246AN XY: 727236
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3461
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2246
AN XY:
727236
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00395 AC: 601AN: 152342Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00428 AC XY: 319AN XY: 74492
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
601
AN:
152342
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
319
AN XY:
74492
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
44
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 06, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 05, 2022 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Pseudohypoaldosteronism type 2C;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Pseudohypoaldosteronism type 2C Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at