rs141979202

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):c.1960G>A(p.Glu654Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E654D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.76

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

RPGRIP1L Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Meckel syndrome, type 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Joubert syndrome 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
COACH syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with renal defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

RPGRIP1L links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00853169).

BP6

Variant 16-53652727-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53652727-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 319661.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000276 (42/152242) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00655 (34/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00482. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 20 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	NM_015272.5 link	c.1960G>A	p.Glu654Lys	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 27	ENST00000647211.2	NP_056087.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	ENST00000647211.2 link	c.1960G>A	p.Glu654Lys	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 27		NM_015272.5	ENSP00000493946.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000283

AC:

AN:

152124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00673

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000545

AC:

137

AN:

251288

AF XY:

0.000479

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000579

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00696

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000125

AC:

182

AN:

1461814

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000106

AC XY:

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00335

AC:

133

AN:

39680

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000719

AC:

AN:

1111980

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000513

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.460

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000276

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41554

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00655

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000622

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10578

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.499

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000571

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000223

ExAC

AF:

0.000494

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Meckel syndrome, type 5

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome 7

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome

Benign:1

May 08, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 8

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.086

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.31

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.22

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.74

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.012

.;.;T;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.58

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.45

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.078

LIST_S2

Benign

0.76

T;.;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0085

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.61

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.34

N;N;.;N;.;.

PhyloP100

1.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.10

N;.;.;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.65

T;.;.;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.88

T;.;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0020

B;B;.;B;.;.

Vest4

0.33

MVP

0.65

MPC

0.083

ClinPred

0.013

GERP RS

4.5

Varity_R

0.049

gMVP

0.41

Mutation Taster

=91/9

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over