rs142032474

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006302.3(MOGS):​c.1838G>A​(p.Arg613Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00848 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 65 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R613W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0087 ( 63 hom. )

Consequence

MOGS
NM_006302.3 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.440

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MOGS (HGNC:24862): (mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase) This gene encodes the first enzyme in the N-linked oligosaccharide processing pathway. The enzyme cleaves the distal alpha-1,2-linked glucose residue from the Glc(3)-Man(9)-GlcNAc(2) oligosaccharide precursor. This protein is located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. Defects in this gene are a cause of type IIb congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDGIIb). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
MOGS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014911711).
BP6
Variant 2-74461951-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-74461951-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 95358.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00637 (970/152284) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00916 (623/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00856. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 474 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MOGSNM_006302.3 linkc.1838G>A p.Arg613Gln missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000448666.7 NP_006293.2 Q13724-1A0A384MDR6
MOGSNM_001146158.2 linkc.1520G>A p.Arg507Gln missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 NP_001139630.1 Q13724-2Q58F09

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MOGSENST00000448666.7 linkc.1838G>A p.Arg613Gln missense_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_006302.3 ENSP00000410992.3 Q13724-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00637
AC:
970
AN:
152166
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00877
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00372
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00405
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00916
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0134
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00679
AC:
1693
AN:
249446
AF XY:
0.00665
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00573
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000556
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00418
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00952
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00792
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00870
AC:
12717
AN:
1461830
Hom.:
63
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00855
AC XY:
6219
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00134
AC:
45
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00651
AC:
291
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0167
AC:
437
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00310
AC:
267
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00406
AC:
217
AN:
53392
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00867
AC:
50
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00979
AC:
10886
AN:
1111986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00866
AC:
523
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
879
1758
2636
3515
4394
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
414
828
1242
1656
2070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00637
AC:
970
AN:
152284
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00637
AC XY:
474
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
60
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00876
AC:
134
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
59
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00372
AC:
18
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00405
AC:
43
AN:
10612
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00916
AC:
623
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
28
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
49
97
146
194
243
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00908
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.00652
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00917
AC:
34
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0119
AC:
46
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00211
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0112
AC:
95
ExAC
AF:
0.00666
AC:
807
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0108
EpiControl
AF:
0.00954

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jun 12, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 16, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 18, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

MOGS-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:3
Jul 07, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Mar 17, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MOGS: BP4, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.70
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
CADD
Benign
0.091
DANN
Benign
0.83
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0054
T;T;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.7
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
.;T;.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;L;.;.;.
PhyloP100
-0.44
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.88
.;N;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.050
Sift
Benign
0.99
.;T;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.47
.;T;.;.;T
Polyphen
0.0070
B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.055, 0.056
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.0040
T
GERP RS
-2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.017
gMVP
0.26
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142032474; hg19: chr2-74689078; COSMIC: COSV51968812; COSMIC: COSV51968812; API