rs142106322
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1
The NM_030777.4(SLC2A10):c.765C>T(p.Ser255=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000717 in 1,614,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00073 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
SLC2A10
NM_030777.4 synonymous
NM_030777.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.162
Genes affected
SLC2A10 (HGNC:13444): (solute carrier family 2 member 10) This gene encodes a member of the class III facilitative glucose transporter family. The encoded protein plays a role in regulation of glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with arterial tortuosity syndrome.[provided by RefSeq, Dec 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 20-46725801-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-46725801-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 213717.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr20-46725801-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr20-46725801-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.162 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000604 (92/152368) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00222 (34/15312). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00163. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A10 | NM_030777.4 | c.765C>T | p.Ser255= | synonymous_variant | 2/5 | ENST00000359271.4 | NP_110404.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A10 | ENST00000359271.4 | c.765C>T | p.Ser255= | synonymous_variant | 2/5 | 1 | NM_030777.4 | ENSP00000352216 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000604 AC: 92AN: 152250Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152250
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000566 AC: 142AN: 251078Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000553 AC XY: 75AN XY: 135740
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
142
AN:
251078
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
75
AN XY:
135740
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000729 AC: 1065AN: 1461870Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000714 AC XY: 519AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1065
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
519
AN XY:
727234
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000604 AC: 92AN: 152368Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000631 AC XY: 47AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152368
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 14, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 25, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Arterial tortuosity syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 08, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 04, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2023 | SLC2A10: BP4, BP7 - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 13, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at