rs142331907

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):c.3675G>A(p.Ser1225=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000678 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

CNTNAP2
NM_014141.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.263

Variant links:

Genes affected

CNTNAP2 (HGNC:13830): (contactin associated protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the neurexin family which functions in the vertebrate nervous system as cell adhesion molecules and receptors. This protein, like other neurexin proteins, contains epidermal growth factor repeats and laminin G domains. In addition, it includes an F5/8 type C domain, discoidin/neuropilin- and fibrinogen-like domains, thrombospondin N-terminal-like domains and a putative PDZ binding site. This protein is localized at the juxtaparanodes of myelinated axons, and mediates interactions between neurons and glia during nervous system development and is also involved in localization of potassium channels within differentiating axons. This gene encompasses almost 1.5% of chromosome 7 and is one of the largest genes in the human genome. It is directly bound and regulated by forkhead box protein P2, a transcription factor related to speech and language development. This gene has been implicated in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, ADHD and intellectual disability. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

CNTNAP2 links:

LOC105375554 (HGNC:):

LOC105375554 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).

BP6

Variant 7-148383848-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-148383848-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136831.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.263 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CNTNAP2	NM_014141.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.3675G>A	p.Ser1225=	synonymous_variant	22/24	ENST00000361727.8
LOC105375554	XR_928093.3 linkuse as main transcript	n.446-2178C>T		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CNTNAP2	ENST00000361727.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.3675G>A	p.Ser1225=	synonymous_variant	22/24	1	NM_014141.6	P1	Q9UHC6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00380

AC:

578

AN:

152082

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00243

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000960

AC:

240

AN:

250064

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000738

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

135502

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000782

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000443

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000492

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000353

AC:

516

AN:

1461676

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000337

AC XY:

245

AN XY:

727150

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0120

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000872

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000144

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000811

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00380

AC:

579

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00370

AC XY:

275

AN XY:

74404

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0128

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00242

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00198

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00469

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago	Nov 24, 2014	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 31, 2013	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 24, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Dec 23, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

Cadd

Benign

Dann

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over