Menu
GeneBe

rs142338762

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.9324A>G(p.Glu3108=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000236 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.69
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 14-102027997-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102027997-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 387092.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.69 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152214) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000206 (14/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000124. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.9324A>G p.Glu3108= synonymous_variant 48/78 ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.9324A>G p.Glu3108= synonymous_variant 48/781 NM_001376.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000103
AC:
26
AN:
251492
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000132
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135922
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000211
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000249
AC:
364
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000259
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000317
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74376
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000251
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000117
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 09, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 06, 2021- -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
DYNC1H1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 08, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
Cadd
Benign
4.0
Dann
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142338762; hg19: chr14-102494334; API